Premier bodybuilding forum

COMPARING SARMS VS STEROIDS

imzi_1

Member
101
2
16
You will often see people compare Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) vs Anabolic Androgenic Steroids.

Compounds such as Testosterone and Trenbolone are known for increasing muscle mass very rapidly, but they also carry a lot of side effects.

SARMs have a different mechanism than steroids do. This allows them to build muscle in a similar way but without horrible side effects.

Don’t get me wrong, these compounds are not 100% side effect free. You can definitely experience things like suppressed hormone levels and nausea but it’s nothing compared to the side effects of steroids.

A few selective androgen receptor modulators, in particular, are said to actually mimic the anabolic effects of steroids. Testolone and S-23 are hands down the closest thing to actual steroids.

Some users even choose to stack SARMs and Steroids together. You will often see people run Testolone and Ligandrol along their steroid cycle. Mainly as a Kickstarter for the cycle.

It is said they are also much easier to recover from.

When you look at SARMs vs Steroids, the impact from compounds such as Testosterone will be much bigger than with a SARM like Ostarine.
 
Advertise here! $199.99 a month Email boss@roidforums.com
Top